Skip to main content

Phillip Rodriguez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, L.P., Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Stephen Martinez, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Meredith Reid, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally Debra Ann Godoy, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally

Tex. App.—13th Dist.October 7, 2021No. 13-20-00467-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Texas
Circuit
5th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, but the specific substantive outcome (plaintiff win, defendant win, or dismissal) cannot be determined from this order alone as it does not detail the trial court's ruling.

What This Ruling Means

**Rodriguez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company - Employment Dispute** Phillip Rodriguez filed a lawsuit against H.E. Butt Grocery Company (H-E-B) and several of its employees, including managers William Tate, Stephen Martinez, Meredith Reid, and Debra Ann Godoy. The case involved employment law issues, though the specific details of Rodriguez's complaints against the grocery chain and these individual employees are not available from the court records provided. The court's final decision in this case is not clear from the available information. The case was heard by a Texas appeals court in October 2021, but the outcome and any damages awarded (if any) were not reported in the case summary. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific claims or outcome, this case highlights an important principle: employees can potentially hold both their employer and individual managers or supervisors personally responsible for workplace violations. The fact that Rodriguez named multiple H-E-B employees "jointly and severally" means he was seeking to hold each person individually accountable for the alleged wrongdoing. This shows workers may have options to pursue claims against specific individuals who they believe violated their workplace rights, not just the company itself.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Phillip Rodriguez v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, L.P., Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Stephen Martinez, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company Meredith Reid, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally Debra Ann Godoy, as Employee of H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Jointly and Severally from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.