Skip to main content

Hee-Joo Park v. Employment Security Department

Wash. Ct. App.February 20, 2001No. No. 46316-1-I
Defendant WinEmployment Security Department
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the Superior Court's judgment against the plaintiff in an appeal involving the Employment Security Department, upholding the lower court's decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Park v. Employment Security Department: Court Ruling Summary** Hee-Joo Park had a dispute with Washington State's Employment Security Department, though the specific details of what sparked the disagreement are not available in the court records. The case involved employment law issues and went through the court system, starting in Superior Court and then moving to the Court of Appeals. The Washington Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision in February 2001. However, the available court documents don't specify exactly what the courts ruled or which side won the case. The appeals court simply affirmed that the Superior Court had made the correct decision, whatever that decision was. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific details of this case, workers can take away that employment disputes with government agencies can be challenged in court and may go through multiple levels of the court system. If you disagree with a decision made by a state employment agency, you have the right to seek review through the courts. However, the appeals process can be lengthy and complex, often requiring legal representation to navigate successfully.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.