Skip to main content

Rafn Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Wash. Ct. App.February 15, 2001No. No. 25575-8-IICited 3 times
Defendant WinRafn Company
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Houghton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment upholding the constitutionality of RCW 51.16.060, which requires hiring companies to pay industrial insurance premiums when temporary help companies fail to do so. The court rejected Rafn Company's challenges under both procedural and substantive due process.

What This Ruling Means

# Rafn Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries ## What Happened Rafn Co. had a dispute with Washington's Department of Labor & Industries. The case involved employment law issues, though specific details about the underlying dispute aren't available in this court record. ## What the Court Decided The Washington Court of Appeals issued a ruling on February 15, 2001. However, the final outcome of the case is not documented in this summary, so it's unclear whether the company or the department prevailed. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case is significant because it involved Washington state's labor department—the agency responsible for protecting worker rights and enforcing employment laws. Cases like this help shape how employers must follow labor rules and how disputes between companies and labor agencies are resolved. Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case reminds workers that they have a government agency dedicated to enforcing their workplace rights. If workers believe their employer has violated labor laws, the Department of Labor & Industries is an important resource for investigation and resolution.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Michael Salvo, App. V. Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission, Et Ano, Resp.
Wash. Ct. App.May 2026
Defendant Win
Rachel Gottschalk V. Washington State Employment Security Department
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 2025
Defendant Win
Neydin Gaspar, on behalf of the Estate of Lenin Estrada Salgado v. The Last Resort Operations, LLC
Wash. Ct. App.Oct 2025
Defendant Win
Loanita Adams, V. Nasro Ugas
Wash. Ct. App.Jan 2025
Defendant Win
Dept. Of Labor & Industries, V. Potelco, Inc.:jeff Lampman & Brett Mongomery
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 2024
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore Rafn Company RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More construction employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.