Skip to main content

Stelter v. Department of Labor & Industries

Wash. Ct. App.July 26, 2001No. No. 19546-5-IIICited 6 times
Plaintiff WinDrotzmann, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kato, Sweeney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The court reversed the summary judgment order denying workers' compensation benefits, holding that a genuine factual dispute exists regarding whether the employee consented to employment with the intrastate trucking subsidiary, which precludes summary judgment.

What This Ruling Means

I don't have enough information to provide an accurate summary of this case. The excerpt you've provided is empty, and the case details only show basic filing information without the actual court decision or facts of the dispute. To write a proper summary explaining what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters for workers, I would need: - The actual court ruling or opinion text - Details about the dispute between the worker and the Department of Labor & Industries - The court's reasoning and final decision - Any relevant employment law issues that were decided If you can provide the full court opinion or a more complete excerpt from the Stelter v. Department of Labor & Industries case, I'd be happy to break it down into plain English for workers. Without these details, any summary I write would be speculation rather than an accurate explanation of what the court actually decided.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.