Skip to main content

Erickson v. Employment Security Department

Wash. Ct. App.June 3, 2002No. No. 49965-3-I
Defendant WinEmployment Security Department
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the superior court's judgment against the appellant in a dispute with the Employment Security Department, upholding the lower court's decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Erickson v. Employment Security Department - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Erickson and Washington State's Employment Security Department, which handles unemployment benefits and related employment matters. While the specific details of what Erickson was challenging aren't provided in the available information, this type of case typically involves disagreements over unemployment benefits, eligibility determinations, or other employment security issues. The Washington Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Employment Security Department in June 2002. The appeals court upheld a lower court's decision that had already sided with the department, meaning Erickson lost at both court levels. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling demonstrates that successfully challenging decisions made by state employment agencies can be difficult. Workers who disagree with determinations about unemployment benefits or other employment security matters face an uphill battle in court. The fact that Erickson lost at both the trial and appeals level shows that courts tend to give deference to these government agencies' decisions. Workers considering similar challenges should be prepared for a potentially lengthy legal process with uncertain outcomes, and may want to exhaust all administrative appeals before pursuing court action.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.