Skip to main content

Nordlund v. Employment Security Department

Wash. Ct. App.October 10, 2006No. No. 34143-3-II
Defendant WinExpedia, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Armstrong, Bridgewater, Hunt
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The court affirmed the Employment Security Department's denial of unemployment benefits, finding that Nordlund voluntarily quit her employment without good cause by failing to maintain contact with her employer or provide required FMLA documentation after her mother's illness and death.

What This Ruling Means

**The Dispute** Maria Nordlund worked for Expedia, Inc. and took time off when her mother became ill and later died. After her mother's death, Nordlund failed to stay in contact with her employer and didn't provide the required Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) paperwork. When she applied for unemployment benefits after losing her job, the Employment Security Department denied her claim, saying she had voluntarily quit without good reason. **The Court's Decision** The Washington Court of Appeals sided with the Employment Security Department. The court ruled that Nordlund had essentially quit her job by not maintaining contact with Expedia or submitting the necessary FMLA documentation. Even though she was dealing with a family tragedy, the court found she didn't have "good cause" to abandon her job responsibilities entirely. **What This Means for Workers** This case highlights the importance of staying in communication with your employer during family emergencies, even during incredibly difficult times. While FMLA protects your right to take leave for serious family illness or death, you must follow proper procedures and maintain contact with your employer. If you don't, you risk losing both your job and your eligibility for unemployment benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.