Skip to main content

Raysbrook v. Employment Security Department

Wash. Ct. App.February 19, 2013No. No. 67863-9-I
Defendant WinEmployment Security Department
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Becker, Schindler
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court of Appeals affirmed the Superior Court's judgment, upholding the Employment Security Department's decision against the appellant Raysbrook.

What This Ruling Means

**Raysbrook v. Employment Security Department - Court Ruling Summary** **What happened:** A worker named Raysbrook filed a lawsuit against Washington State's Employment Security Department, which is the agency that handles unemployment benefits and employment-related services. The specific details of Raysbrook's complaint are not provided in the available information, but it involved an employment law dispute with this state agency. **What the court decided:** The Washington State Court of Appeals dismissed Raysbrook's case in February 2013. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without ruling in the worker's favor. No monetary damages were awarded, and Raysbrook did not win their legal challenge against the Employment Security Department. **Why this matters for workers:** While the limited information makes it difficult to draw specific lessons, this case shows that challenging decisions made by state employment agencies can be difficult. Workers who disagree with unemployment benefit determinations or other employment-related decisions by government agencies may face an uphill battle in court. The dismissal suggests that workers need strong legal grounds and proper documentation when pursuing legal action against state employment departments. Workers should carefully review agency procedures and consider all available administrative appeals before pursuing costly litigation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.