Skip to main content

Kalash v. Employment Security Department

Wash. Ct. App.January 28, 2014No. No. 43947-6-II
Defendant WinEmployment Security Department
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bjorgen, Johanson, Maxa
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court of appeals affirmed the superior court's judgment in favor of the Employment Security Department, upholding a decision in an employment-related dispute regarding unemployment benefits or similar employment security matters.

What This Ruling Means

**Kalash v. Employment Security Department: Administrative Appeal Case** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Kalash and Washington State's Employment Security Department, which handles unemployment benefits and related employment matters. The specific details of what Kalash was appealing are not clear from the available information, but it was an administrative appeal - meaning Kalash was challenging a decision the department had made about their case. Unfortunately, the court's final decision in this case is not available from the provided information. Administrative appeals typically involve disputes over unemployment benefit eligibility, benefit amounts, or decisions about whether someone was fired for misconduct versus laid off. **What This Means for Workers:** Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it demonstrates an important right that workers have. When government agencies like the Employment Security Department make decisions that affect your unemployment benefits or employment status, you typically have the right to appeal those decisions in court. This process allows workers to challenge agency decisions they believe are wrong or unfair. If you disagree with a decision about your unemployment benefits, you generally have options to contest that decision through the proper legal channels.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.