Skip to main content

B&R Sales, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Wash. Ct. App.March 10, 2015No. No. 45765-2-IICited 16 times
Defendant WinB&R Sales, Inc.$87,752.23 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Johanson, Lee, Maxa
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board's decision that B&R's independent contractor floor installers were 'workers' under RCW 51.08.180, requiring B&R to pay industrial insurance premiums, interest, and penalties.

What This Ruling Means

**B&R Sales, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute between B&R Sales, Inc. and Washington State's Department of Labor & Industries. The company challenged some action or decision made by the state labor department, though the specific details of their disagreement are not provided in the available information. **What the Court Decided:** The Washington Court of Appeals dismissed B&R Sales' case in March 2015. This means the court either found that the company didn't have valid grounds to challenge the labor department's decision, or that there were procedural issues that prevented the case from moving forward. No damages were awarded to either party. **What This Means for Workers:** When courts dismiss challenges against the Department of Labor & Industries, it generally means the department's authority and decisions are being upheld. This is typically good news for workers because the Department of Labor & Industries exists to enforce workplace safety rules, wage laws, and workers' compensation protections. The dismissal suggests that whatever action the department took was within its proper authority to protect workers' rights and safety. *Note: This summary is based on limited case information and is for educational purposes only.*

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Teamsters Local 839 v. Benton County
Wash. Ct. App.Jul 2026
Defendant Win
Michael Salvo, App. V. Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission, Et Ano, Resp.
Wash. Ct. App.May 2026
Defendant Win
Rachel Gottschalk V. Washington State Employment Security Department
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 2025
Defendant Win
Neydin Gaspar, on behalf of the Estate of Lenin Estrada Salgado v. The Last Resort Operations, LLC
Wash. Ct. App.Oct 2025
Defendant Win
Loanita Adams, V. Nasro Ugas
Wash. Ct. App.Jan 2025
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore B&R Sales, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from WashingtonMore construction employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.