Osborne v. Yadkin Valley Econ. Dev. Dist. Inc.
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
Claim Types
Outcome
The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of the Stokes County Board of Education on negligence and Title IX claims, and affirmed dismissal of Section 1983 claims. The court found the Board did not breach a duty of care and was not liable under Title IX despite sexual assaults committed by a contracted transportation provider.
Excerpt
Negligence duty of care sexual assault Title IX Section 1983 substantive due process equal protection independent contractor tort law failure to train and supervise precedent education special-needs exceptional children summary judgment and motion to dismiss
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Osborne from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Negligence duty of care sexual assault Title IX Section 1983 substantive due process equal protection independent contractor tort law failure to train and supervise precedent education special-needs exceptional children summary judgment and motion to dismiss
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.