Skip to main content

Kimbrough v. Division of Employment Security

Mo. Ct. App.June 26, 2012No. No. WD 74353
Defendant Win
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Howard, Mitchell, Pfeiffer
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's denial of unemployment benefits, finding the claimant was terminated for misconduct after three consecutive no-call/no-show absences.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information available, this case involved a worker named Kimbrough who had a dispute with Missouri's Division of Employment Security in 2012. The Division of Employment Security is the state agency that handles unemployment benefits and employment-related matters. Unfortunately, the specific details of what Kimbrough was fighting about and how the court ruled are not clear from the available information. The case was decided by a Missouri appeals court on June 26, 2012, but the outcome and reasoning behind the court's decision are unknown. **What this means for workers:** While we cannot draw specific lessons from this particular case due to incomplete information, disputes with the Division of Employment Security typically involve issues like: - Denial of unemployment benefits - Questions about job search requirements - Disputes over why someone left their job - Eligibility determinations Workers facing similar situations should know they have the right to appeal decisions made by their state's employment security division. If you disagree with a decision about unemployment benefits or other employment matters, you can typically request a hearing and present your case. Having documentation and understanding the specific requirements in your state is important for these proceedings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.