Skip to main content

Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.

Tex. App.—2nd Dist.September 30, 2021No. 02-21-00154-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of plaintiffs' motion to compel arbitration, finding that plaintiffs waived their right to arbitration through litigation conduct after receiving notice of the arbitration agreement thirteen months prior to filing their motion to compel.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved wrongful death and personal injury claims against the operators of Temptations Cabaret, a nightclub. Multiple families filed lawsuits after incidents that resulted in deaths and injuries. The plaintiffs included Maria Socorro Estrada (representing her deceased husband Cesar Estrada Rangel and their minor children), Juliana Meza (representing deceased Leo Marin and a minor), and other family members seeking compensation for their losses. **What the Court Decided** The case was heard by a Texas Court of Appeals in 2021, but the specific outcome and court's reasoning are not available in the public records. The case involved multiple corporate entities that operated the nightclub, including the direct operator and parent companies. **Why This Matters for Workers** While the specific outcome isn't known, this case highlights important workplace safety issues in the hospitality and entertainment industry. Workers in bars, clubs, and similar venues face unique safety risks that employers must address. The case demonstrates that when workplace incidents result in serious injuries or deaths, families can pursue legal action against not just the direct employer, but also parent companies that may share responsibility for maintaining safe working conditions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc. from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.