Skip to main content

Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc.

Tex. App.—2nd Dist.October 5, 2021No. 02-21-00154-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The trial court denied plaintiffs' motion to compel arbitration, and the appellate court affirmed, holding that plaintiffs waived their right to arbitration by substantially invoking the judicial process for thirteen months after learning of the arbitration agreement.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved families filing lawsuits against Temptations Cabaret and its parent companies after incidents occurred at the establishment that apparently resulted in deaths. The families, including Maria Socorro Estrada representing her deceased husband Cesar Estrada Rangel and their minor children, along with Juliana Meza representing deceased Leo Marin, brought employment-related claims against the business and its corporate owners. **What the Court Decided:** The case went to the Texas Court of Appeals, but the available records don't provide enough detail to determine the specific outcome or what the court ultimately ruled on the employment law claims. **Why This Matters for Workers:** While the specific details and outcome aren't clear from the available information, this case demonstrates that workers and their families can pursue legal action against employers when workplace incidents result in serious harm or death. The fact that multiple corporate entities were named shows that workers may be able to hold both the direct employer and parent companies accountable. However, without knowing the court's decision, it's difficult to draw specific lessons about workers' rights or employer responsibilities from this particular case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Maria Socorro Estrada, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Cesar Estrada Rangel, and as Next of Friend to C.E., Jr., Y.E. and N.E., Minors Juliana Meza on Behalf of the Estate of Leo Marin and as Next Friend to E.I.M., a Minor Amanda M. Estrada as Next Friend to J.O.H.P., a Minor And Damian Michael Estrada v. 12291 CBW, LLC D/B/A Temptations Cabaret, Inc. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. And RCI Holdings, Inc. from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.