Havens v. Moore
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Piper
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- Appeal affirming dismissal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The court affirmed dismissal of plaintiff's claims against public officials and employees based on governmental immunity under Ohio Revised Code 2744, and found neighbors not liable under any cognizable claim raised.
Excerpt
Pro se litigants are not to be accorded greater rights and must accept the results of their own mistakes and errors, including those related to correct legal procedure. In this case, the public officials and employees are entitled to immunity under R.C. 2744 as they were performing governmental actions and none of the exceptions to immunity apply. Furthermore, though appellant's neighbors are not entitled to governmental immunity, they're not liable under any cognizable claim raised by appellant.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.