Skip to main content

Division of Employment Security v. Danzig

Mo. Ct. App.March 10, 2015No. No. ED 101711
Defendant WinHoward Danzig
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hess, Hoff, Sullivan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the Missouri Division of Employment Security, enforcing an administrative subpoena duces tecum and ordering Danzig to produce records required under Section 288.130.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** The Missouri Department of Labor's Division of Employment Security issued a subpoena requiring Danzig (likely an employer) to turn over employment records for investigation. Danzig refused to comply and challenged the subpoena in court, arguing the state agency didn't have the authority to demand these records. **What the court decided:** Both the trial court and appeals court ruled in favor of the Missouri Department of Labor. The courts upheld the agency's right to enforce its subpoena and require Danzig to produce the requested employment records. This means Danzig must hand over the documents to the state investigators. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling strengthens state labor agencies' ability to investigate potential violations of employment laws. When workers file complaints about unpaid wages, workplace safety issues, or other labor violations, state investigators often need access to company records to build their cases. This decision confirms that employers cannot simply refuse to cooperate with legitimate government investigations. It helps ensure that state agencies have the tools they need to enforce labor protections and hold employers accountable when workers' rights may have been violated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.