Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 580

2nd CircuitFebruary 11, 1991No. 712Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's findings that Local 580 and AJEF were in contempt of a 1978 Consent Judgment prohibiting racial discrimination in union apprenticeship and employment practices, and upheld comprehensive remedial measures including appointment of a Special Master and backpay hearings.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Found in Contempt for Continuing Racial Discrimination** This case involved a construction union, Local 580 of the International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, and its training program that had been caught discriminating against workers based on race. In 1978, the union had agreed to stop these discriminatory practices through a court settlement. However, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission later accused the union of continuing to discriminate against minority workers in violation of that agreement. The federal appeals court ruled that the union had indeed violated the 1978 agreement and was in contempt of court for continuing racial discrimination in their apprenticeship and employment practices. The court upheld strong remedial measures, including appointing a Special Master to oversee the union's operations and ordering hearings to determine back pay for workers who had been discriminated against. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will enforce anti-discrimination agreements and hold unions accountable when they continue illegal practices. It demonstrates that workers have legal protections against racial discrimination in union apprenticeship programs and employment opportunities, and that violations can result in compensation and ongoing court supervision.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.