Skip to main content

Marzigliano v. New York City Employees' Retirement System (NYCERS)

N.Y. App. Div.March 28, 2006Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's denial of petitioner's application for disability retirement pension, upholding the administrative determination by NYCERS under the narrow standard of review applicable to such proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

# Marzigliano v. New York City Employees' Retirement System ## What Happened Marzigliano applied for a disability retirement pension from NYCERS, New York City's retirement system for public employees. When NYCERS denied his application, he challenged the decision in court, arguing the denial was wrong. ## What the Court Decided The appellate court sided with NYCERS and upheld the denial of his pension application. The court confirmed that the lower court correctly rejected Marzigliano's challenge, finding that NYCERS had properly reviewed his case according to the rules that apply to pension disputes. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case illustrates that courts give significant deference to retirement system decisions about disability pensions. Workers seeking disability retirement benefits face a high bar when challenging a denial in court. The system has its own review process, and courts will generally not overturn those determinations unless there's a clear legal error. If you're denied a disability pension, expect that winning an appeal will be difficult and require strong evidence that the retirement system made a mistake.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.