Skip to main content

Ford v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

N.Y. App. Div.June 19, 2007Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the dismissal of petitioner's CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of disability retirement benefits, finding the petition was barred by the four-month statute of limitations.

What This Ruling Means

# Ford v. New York City Employees' Retirement System **What Happened** An employee named Ford applied for disability retirement benefits through New York City's pension system but was denied. Ford filed a court case challenging this decision, hoping to overturn it. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled against Ford and dismissed the case. The judge found that Ford had waited too long to file the challenge—specifically, more than four months after being denied benefits. Because the law sets a strict four-month deadline for filing this type of complaint, Ford's case couldn't proceed, regardless of whether the denial decision was correct. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that timing is critical when challenging benefit denials. Workers who are denied disability retirement benefits must act quickly—within four months—or lose their legal right to challenge the decision in court. If you're denied important benefits like disability retirement, you should consult with someone familiar with these time limits immediately, as waiting too long will prevent you from having your case heard.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.