Skip to main content

Raymond Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

N.Y. App. Div.December 27, 2007Cited 3 times
Mixed ResultNational Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh$2,514,483.44 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Mugglin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the judgment in favor of the insurance company defendant but reversed the award of predecision interest of $895,625 and remitted the matter for determination of whether plaintiff could deduct defense costs from the $2.5 million judgment.

What This Ruling Means

# Raymond Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh (2007) ## What Happened Raymond Corp. sued National Union Fire Insurance Company, claiming the insurance company broke their contract. The case involved a dispute over whether the insurance company properly fulfilled its obligations to Raymond Corp. ## What the Court Decided The appellate court mostly sided with the insurance company but made an important adjustment. The court confirmed the insurance company should pay Raymond Corp. $2.5 million in damages for breach of contract. However, the court removed an additional $895,625 in accumulated interest that had been awarded before the case ended. The court also sent the case back to be reconsidered regarding whether certain legal defense costs could be subtracted from the final payment. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that when insurance companies don't meet their contractual obligations, they can be held financially responsible. For workers who depend on employer-provided insurance or coverage, this ruling reinforces that these companies must honor their agreements. Even when courts side with insurance companies, they carefully review damages to ensure fairness, which protects people relying on promised insurance benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Raymond Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.