Skip to main content

A. Uliano & Son. Ltd. v. New York State Department of Labor

N.Y. App. Div.July 11, 2012
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate division annulled the Department of Labor's determination regarding daily wage classification for one employee (Bradley) due to lack of substantial evidence for the classification methodology, but upheld the determination regarding hours worked, willful violation finding, and falsification of payroll records.

What This Ruling Means

**Company Challenges State's Wage Violation Findings** A. Uliano & Son Ltd., a construction company, disputed the New York State Department of Labor's findings that it violated wage laws. The state agency determined that the company improperly classified an employee named Bradley's daily wages, failed to pay proper wages for hours worked, willfully violated wage laws, and falsified payroll records. The appeals court delivered a split decision. It sided with the company on one issue, ruling that the Department of Labor didn't have enough evidence to support how it calculated Bradley's daily wage classification. However, the court upheld the state's other findings against the company – confirming that the employer failed to pay proper wages for actual hours worked, willfully violated wage laws, and falsified payroll records. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that while employers can sometimes successfully challenge specific technical aspects of wage violation determinations, courts generally uphold findings when there's solid evidence of wrongdoing. Workers should know that falsifying payroll records and failing to pay for actual hours worked are serious violations that courts take seriously. Even when employers win on technical issues, they can still be held accountable for the core wage theft violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in A. Uliano & Son. Ltd. v. New York State Department of Labor from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.