Skip to main content

Murray Schwartz Enterprises Employee Pension Plan Trust v. Four Corners Productions, Inc.

N.Y. App. Div.April 25, 2002
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Appellate court partially reinstated plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty and accounting claims regarding funds Four Corners distributed to plaintiff and received from Roundabout, but affirmed dismissal of claims regarding Four Corners' oversight of Roundabout's operating profits.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute over employee pension plan money. Murray Schwartz Enterprises had an employee pension plan, and Four Corners Productions was supposed to help manage some of the plan's business dealings. The pension plan trustees sued Four Corners, claiming the company broke its contract and failed to properly handle the plan's money. Specifically, they accused Four Corners of mismanaging funds that were distributed to the pension plan and received from another company called Roundabout. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court gave a mixed ruling. It allowed some of the pension plan's claims to move forward - specifically those about how Four Corners handled money distributions and receipts involving Roundabout. However, the court upheld the dismissal of claims about Four Corners' general oversight of Roundabout's operating profits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that companies managing employee pension funds can be held accountable for how they handle that money. When employers or their partners mismanage pension funds, workers have legal options to challenge those actions. However, the ruling also demonstrates that not all oversight failures will result in successful lawsuits - courts will examine each specific claim about fund mismanagement separately.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.