Skip to main content

Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

CALCTAPP5DJune 14, 2018No. A151224Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bruiniers
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed that IHSS service recipients are the sole employers of in-home supportive services providers under the Direct Payment Mode, making close-family-member providers ineligible for unemployment insurance coverage under Unemployment Insurance Code section 631.

What This Ruling Means

**Family Caregivers Can't Get Unemployment Benefits, Court Rules** This case involved workers who provide in-home care services through California's In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program. Under this program, elderly or disabled people receive government funding to hire caregivers to help them at home. Skidgel and other family members who worked as IHSS caregivers applied for unemployment benefits after losing their jobs, but were denied. The court ruled against the workers, confirming they cannot receive unemployment insurance. The judges determined that under California's Direct Payment Mode system, the care recipients themselves—not the state or county—are the legal employers of IHSS workers. Since these workers were providing care to their own family members, state law specifically excludes them from unemployment benefits coverage. This decision matters because it affects thousands of family caregivers across California. Family members who work as paid IHSS providers cannot count on unemployment benefits if they lose their caregiving positions. This creates financial uncertainty for workers in these roles, as they lack the same safety net available to most other employees. Workers considering IHSS positions should understand this limitation when planning their finances.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.