Skip to main content

Hickory Heights Health & Rehab, LLC v. Adams

Ark. Ct. App.November 28, 2018No. No. CV-18-380Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Abramson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of the nursing home's motion to compel arbitration, holding that the arbitration agreement lacked mutual obligation because it shielded the facility from litigation while preserving its right to sue residents in court for collection matters.

What This Ruling Means

**Hickory Heights Health & Rehab, LLC v. Adams: Court Protects Workers from One-Sided Arbitration** This case involved a dispute between a nursing home facility and a resident (or their family) over claims of negligence, medical malpractice, and contract violations. The nursing home wanted to force the case into private arbitration instead of allowing it to proceed in court, based on an arbitration agreement the resident had signed. The Arkansas Court of Appeals ruled against the nursing home and allowed the case to continue in court. The court found that the arbitration agreement was unfairly one-sided. While it prevented residents from suing the facility in court, it still allowed the nursing home to sue residents in regular courts for things like unpaid bills. The court said this lack of "mutual obligation" made the agreement unenforceable. This decision matters for workers and consumers because it shows courts will reject arbitration agreements that are blatantly unfair. Many employers and businesses try to use arbitration clauses to shield themselves from lawsuits while keeping their own right to sue. This ruling demonstrates that such one-sided agreements won't hold up in court, helping protect people's access to the justice system.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.