Thompson v. Commonwealth
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Clark, Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Stekrett, Trunkey
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- Pennsylvania
Related Laws
Outcome
The court affirmed the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board's decision to terminate the claimant's disability benefits, finding that the employer met its burden of proving that all work-related disability had ceased.
Excerpt
No. 186 July Term, 1886, Supt. Ct.; court below, No. 32 March Term, 1885.. Q. S Samuel Thompson and Robert Thompson were indicted in the Quarter Sessions uppn an information made by Mrs. Ada Krepps for forcible entry and detainer. On the trial the court below, James Inghram, P. J., submitted to the jury to find from the evidence of facts, which are sufficiently stated in the opinion below, whether the defendants were guilty or not guilty. After verdict for the commonwealth, the defendants made a motion in arrest of judgment upon the ground inter alia that “the evidence did not support the charge”; which motion being overruled the defendant, Samuel Thompson, took this writ, assigning for error the order overruling said motion.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Disability, Ohio Civil Rights Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, substantially limits, physical impairment, constructive discharge, R.C. Chapter 4112, R.C. 4112.06(E), R.C. 4112.08, R.C. 4112.02(A), Adm. Code 4112-5-08(E), Adm. Code 4112-5-01, 42 U.S.C. 12102(4), 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(1)(i), earnings, back pay
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.