Algonquin Coal Co. v. Northern Coal & Iron Co.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mitchell, Williams
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- Pennsylvania
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The court vacated the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review's denial of Trade Readjustment Allowance benefits to laid-off steelworkers and remanded for determination of whether claimants filed within a 'reasonable time' under federal regulations.
Excerpt
Appeal, No. 485, Jan. T., 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., March T., 1894, No. 299, in favor of defendant, in case tried by the court without a jury. Amicable action in trespass. Before Rice, P. J. The case was tried without a jury under the act of April 22,, 1874. The material facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Plaintiff’s point was among others as follows: “1. Under the exception and reservation as to the coal contained in the deed from Thomas Wright to Henry Courtwright, the exclusive ownership of the coal under the land therein described was vested in Thomas Wright.” Refused. [1] Judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were, among others, (1) rejection of point, quoting it; (13) in not entering judgment for plaintiff for value of coal mined.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.