Skip to main content

Sherman Franklin, Jr. v. Durham School Services, L.P.

Tenn. Ct. App.April 7, 2022No. E2020-00715-COA-R10-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Kristi M. Davis
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

This extraordinary appeal arises from a school bus crash in November 2016, which resulted in the tragic death of six children attending Woodmore Elementary School in Chattanooga.1 Plaintiff, an educational assistant at Woodmore, sued the employer of the bus driver for, inter alia, reckless infliction of emotional distress ("RIED"). The educational assistant alleged that the employer's failure to address the bus driver's dangerous driving despite receiving numerous warnings disregarded the children's safety, constituted reckless and outrageous conduct, and caused him serious mental injuries. The trial court denied the employer's motion to dismiss the claim, finding that the educational assistant had sufficiently alleged outrageous conduct on the part of the employer and that he had met all other pleading requirements to sustain his RIED claim. Employer appeals. Although we agree with the trial court that the educational assistant sufficiently alleged conduct so outrageous by the employer that it cannot be tolerated by civilized society, we hold that the educational assistant is not a person who falls within the reasonably foreseeable scope of the particular substantial and unjustifiable risk consciously disregarded by the employer and, therefore, cannot recover under a reckless infliction of emotional distress claim. Consequently, we reverse the trial court's finding on this latter issue and remand the case for dismissal of the action against employer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Sherman Franklin Jr., an educational assistant at Woodmore Elementary School in Chattanooga, sued Durham School Services after a tragic November 2016 school bus crash that killed six children. Franklin claimed the bus company was responsible for reckless infliction of emotional distress. He argued that Durham School Services had received multiple warnings about the bus driver's dangerous driving but failed to take action to address the safety concerns, putting the children at risk. **What the Court Decided:** The Tennessee Court of Appeals remanded the case, meaning they sent it back to the lower court for further proceedings. The court did not make a final ruling on whether Durham School Services was liable for Franklin's emotional distress claim. No damages were reported in this decision. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights that employees who witness workplace tragedies may have legal options to seek compensation for emotional trauma, especially when they can show their employer's negligence contributed to the incident. School employees and other workers in safety-sensitive environments should know they might be able to hold employers accountable when poor safety practices lead to traumatic events, even if they weren't directly injured themselves.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.