Skip to main content

Cherri Schrick v. Durham School Services, L.P.

Tenn. Ct. App.April 7, 2022No. E2020-00744-COA-R10-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Kristi M. Davis
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Excerpt

This extraordinary appeal arises from a school bus crash in November 2016, which resulted in the tragic death of six children attending Woodmore Elementary School in Chattanooga.1 Plaintiff, a fourth grade math and science teacher at Woodmore, sued the employer of the bus driver for, inter alia, reckless infliction of emotional distress ("RIED"). The teacher alleged that the employer's failure to address the bus driver's dangerous driving despite receiving numerous warnings disregarded the children's safety, constituted reckless and outrageous conduct, and caused her serious mental injuries. The trial court denied the employer's motion to dismiss the claim, finding that the teacher had sufficiently alleged outrageous conduct on the part of the employer and that she had met all other pleading requirements to sustain her RIED claim. Employer appeals. Although we agree with the trial court that the teacher sufficiently alleged conduct so outrageous by the employer that it cannot be tolerated by civilized society, we hold that the teacher is not a person who falls within the reasonably foreseeable scope of the particular substantial and unjustifiable risk consciously disregarded by the employer and, therefore, cannot recover under a reckless infliction of emotional distress claim. Consequently, we reverse the trial court's finding on this latter issue and remand the case for dismissal of the action against employer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** A fourth-grade teacher at Woodmore Elementary School sued Durham School Services after a tragic 2016 school bus crash that killed six children. The teacher claimed the bus company caused her severe emotional distress by ignoring repeated warnings about the driver's dangerous driving habits before the fatal accident occurred. **What the Court Decided:** The court sent the case back to a lower court for further proceedings (called a "remand"). This means the higher court didn't make a final decision about whether the teacher should receive compensation, but instead determined that more legal proceedings were needed to properly resolve the dispute. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that employees may have legal options when their emotional wellbeing is severely damaged by their employer's reckless actions, even if they weren't directly physically harmed. Teachers and other workers who witness traumatic events that could have been prevented by better employer oversight might be able to seek compensation for emotional distress. However, these cases can be complex and require careful legal review to determine if the employer's conduct was truly reckless enough to warrant damages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.