Skip to main content

Yarbrough v. Director, Employment Security Department & Conway Transportation Services

Ark. Ct. App.December 12, 2001No. E 01-161Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Agree, Griffen, Roaf, Robbins
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellant Yarbrough prevailed on appeal. The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed the Board of Review's decision disqualifying him from unemployment compensation, finding insufficient substantial evidence that his single tardiness incident constituted misconduct warranting benefits disqualification.

What This Ruling Means

# Yarbrough v. Director, Employment Security Department & Conway Transportation Services ## What Happened Yarbrough filed a dispute involving the Employment Security Department and Conway Transportation Services. The case centered on employment law issues, though specific details about the underlying dispute are limited in available court records. ## What the Court Decided The Arkansas Court of Appeals issued a ruling on December 12, 2001. However, the exact outcome of the decision is not clearly documented in the available case information, and no monetary damages were awarded. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case involves unemployment benefits and employment security matters, which directly affect workers' ability to access unemployment insurance when they lose their jobs. Cases like this help clarify workers' rights to receive benefits they're entitled to during job loss. While the specific ruling details are unclear from these records, cases involving the Employment Security Department typically address whether workers qualify for unemployment benefits and how employers must comply with state employment laws. Workers facing similar situations should understand their rights to appeal employment security decisions through the court system.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.