Skip to main content

Klosterman Baking Co. v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

OhioMay 24, 2000No. No. 99-991Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals in favor of the employer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Klosterman Baking Company had a dispute with the Ohio Bureau of Employment Services (the state agency that handles unemployment benefits and employment matters). While the exact details aren't clear from the available information, this type of case typically involves disagreements about unemployment benefit eligibility, worker classification, or employment service requirements. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case cannot be determined from the available information. The court records don't provide enough detail about how the judge ruled or what specific decision was made in this employment services matter. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Cases between employers and state employment agencies are important because they often shape how unemployment benefits work and what rights workers have when they lose their jobs. These disputes can affect whether workers qualify for benefits, how long they can receive them, or what requirements they must meet. Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, such legal battles help establish the rules that govern the relationship between employers, workers, and the state agencies that provide employment services and unemployment insurance.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.