Skip to main content

Curl v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

OhioJuly 18, 2007No. No. 2006-0115Cited 27 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Stratton
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the lower court's summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, holding that Ohio law requires privity of contract to maintain a breach of implied warranty claim under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and that a vehicle purchased as a used rental car does not qualify as a 'new motor vehicle' under Ohio's Lemon Law.

What This Ruling Means

**Curl v. Volkswagen of America: Used Car Purchase Dispute** This case involved a worker who bought a used rental car from Volkswagen and later experienced problems with the vehicle. The buyer tried to sue Volkswagen for breach of warranty, claiming the company failed to honor promises about the car's quality and reliability. The buyer also attempted to use Ohio's Lemon Law, which typically protects consumers who purchase defective new vehicles. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of Volkswagen. The court determined that the buyer couldn't sue for breach of warranty because there was no direct contractual relationship between the buyer and Volkswagen - the buyer had purchased the car from a rental company, not directly from Volkswagen. Additionally, the court found that Ohio's Lemon Law only applies to new vehicles, not used cars that were previously rental vehicles. **What this means for workers:** If you buy a used car, even from a dealership, your warranty claims may be limited compared to buying new. You typically can only pursue warranty claims against whoever sold you the car directly, not the original manufacturer. Also, consumer protection laws like Lemon Laws usually don't cover used vehicle purchases, so workers have fewer legal protections when buying pre-owned cars.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.