Skip to main content

Chivaho Credit Union v. McGuire

OhioApril 24, 2013No. 2013-0055
Defendant WinChivaho Credit Union
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Connor
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Dismissal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the defendant McGuire, dismissing claims against him.

What This Ruling Means

I don't have enough information about the Chivaho Credit Union v. McGuire case to provide an accurate summary. The details you've provided are very limited - only showing it was an Ohio employment law case filed in 2013 with an unknown outcome and no reported damages. To write a proper summary that would be helpful to workers, I would need key information such as: - What specific employment issue was at dispute (wrongful termination, discrimination, wage disputes, etc.) - What the court actually ruled - The legal reasoning behind the decision - Any significant facts from the case Without these essential details, I cannot provide the factual, clear explanation that workers would need to understand what happened in this case or how it might affect their rights. If you can provide more specific information about the case facts, the court's ruling, and the legal issues involved, I'd be happy to write a plain-English summary that explains what this case means for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

State ex rel. Haydocy v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys.
OhioMay 2026
Defendant Win
State ex rel. AutoZone Stores, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
OhioNov 2024

Workers' compensation—Temporary-total-disability compensation—R.C. 4123.56—Employee who had already been terminated for violation of employment policies before his shoulder surgery was not "unable to work" as "direct result of an impairment arising from an injury or occupational disease" under plain language of R.C. 4123.56(F) and thus was not entitled to receive temporary-total-disability compensation—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and writ granted.

Defendant Win
Shabazz
OhioNov 2024

Quo warranto—Mandamus—Appellants failed to challenge court of appeals' judgment dismissing their quo warranto claim on basis of laches and therefore waived that argument—Court of appeals' determination that appellants could not establish entitlement to city-council offices or that appellees were unlawfully holding the positions affirmed—Court of appeals' denial of request for writ of mandamus ordering continued payment of salaries and benefits as moot affirmed.

Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore Chivaho Credit Union RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More finance employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.