Skip to main content

GIROUX BROS. TRANSPORTATION, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, Defendant, Appellee

1st CircuitJanuary 4, 1996No. 95-1032Cited 35 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Boudin, Aldrich, Coffin
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the pension fund, holding that the fund's withdrawal liability demand was not barred by statute of limitations and that the employer must make interim payments while disputes are resolved through mandatory arbitration.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Giroux Bros. Transportation, Inc., a trucking company, got into a dispute with the New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund. The company challenged some action taken by the pension fund, likely related to contributions the company was required to make for their employees' retirement benefits. The company believed the pension fund had acted improperly and took the matter to court. **What the Court Decided** Both the trial court and the appeals court sided with the pension fund. The appeals court upheld the lower court's decision, ruling that the pension fund had acted correctly in whatever dispute arose with the transportation company. This means Giroux Bros. Transportation lost their challenge against the fund. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling is good news for workers whose retirement benefits are managed through union pension funds. When courts uphold pension funds' actions against employers, it typically means the funds are properly enforcing rules that protect workers' retirement money. It shows that pension funds have legal backing when they take steps to ensure employers meet their obligations to contribute to workers' pensions, helping secure employees' financial future after retirement.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.