Skip to main content

Garland F. DAILL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHEET METAL WORKERS’ LOCAL 73 PENSION FUND, Defendant-Appellant

7th CircuitNovember 13, 1996No. 96-1454Cited 82 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bauer, Flaum, Manion
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal from lower court decision; 7th Circuit affirmed plaintiff's victory

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff-Appellee Garland Daill prevailed against Sheet Metal Workers' Local 73 Pension Fund in a pension benefits dispute. The 7th Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Garland Daill, a worker, got into a dispute with his union pension fund over pension benefits he believed he was owed. The Sheet Metal Workers' Local 73 Pension Fund disagreed with Daill's claim and refused to pay the benefits. Daill sued the pension fund under ERISA, the federal law that protects worker retirement benefits. **What the Court Decided** Both the trial court and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Daill. The appeals court upheld the lower court's decision, confirming that the pension fund was wrong to deny his benefits claim. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that workers have legal options when pension funds wrongfully deny their benefits. Even when facing a well-funded union pension plan, individual workers can successfully challenge benefit denials in court. The ruling reinforces that ERISA provides meaningful protection for workers' retirement benefits. If a pension fund denies benefits that a worker believes they're entitled to, the courts will carefully review these decisions and side with workers when the denial is improper. This gives workers confidence that their earned pension benefits are legally protected.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.