Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Freeman

D. Md.September 3, 2015No. Case No. RWT 09cv2573Cited 9 times
Defendant WinFreeman
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Titus
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted summary judgment in favor of Freeman (defendant employer) after excluding the EEOC's expert reports as unreliable, finding the EEOC failed to produce reliable statistical evidence of disparate impact required for a prima facie case under Title VII. The court also awarded Freeman reasonable attorneys' fees, holding the EEOC's continued litigation after the expert evidence was revealed to be defective was unreasonable.

What This Ruling Means

**EEOC v. Freeman: Background Check Discrimination Case** This case involved the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) suing Freeman, a background check company, over allegations that the company's hiring practices discriminated against African American and Hispanic job applicants. The EEOC claimed that Freeman's use of criminal background checks and credit history screenings had a disproportionate negative impact on minority applicants, effectively screening them out of jobs at higher rates than white applicants. The court dismissed the EEOC's case in 2015. The judge found that the EEOC failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that Freeman's background check policies actually caused discrimination. The court determined that the EEOC's statistical analysis was flawed and didn't adequately demonstrate that the company's hiring practices violated federal employment discrimination laws. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling shows how difficult it can be to challenge employer practices that may seem neutral but affect certain groups more heavily. While employers can still use background checks in hiring, workers should know that such practices must be job-related and consistent with business needs. If you believe an employer's screening process unfairly discriminates, documenting the impact and seeking legal guidance remains important, though proving discrimination can be challenging.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.