Skip to main content

Gillespie v. Charter Communications

E.D. Mo.September 24, 2015No. Case No. 4:14CV00207 AGFCited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
133 F. Supp. 3d 1195, 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 996, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128185, 2015 WL 5638055
Judge(s)
Fleissig
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on the issue of post-judgment interest entitlement but lost on pre-judgment interest. The court remanded for recalculation of interest from May 26, 1972 (date of payment order) to October 3, 1973 (date paid), rejecting plaintiff's earlier award that included interest from February 3, 1972.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a dispute over interest payments on money owed to a worker. The worker (Gillespie) had won a previous court case and was awarded money, but there was disagreement about how much additional interest should be paid on top of that award. The dispute centered on when the interest should start counting - from February 1972 or from May 1972 - and whether interest should be paid both before and after the court's judgment. **What the Court Decided:** The court made a split decision. The worker won the right to collect interest on the money after the court ordered payment (post-judgment interest). However, the worker lost on getting interest for the time before the court made its final decision (pre-judgment interest). The court sent the case back to recalculate the interest, saying it should only count from May 26, 1972 (when payment was ordered) to October 3, 1973 (when actually paid). **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling shows that workers who win employment cases may be entitled to additional interest payments if employers delay paying court-ordered awards. However, the timing of when that interest starts accumulating can significantly affect the final amount received.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.