Skip to main content

Davis v. Con-Way Freight Inc.

D. Or.October 4, 2015No. No. 3:14-cv-01389-HZ
Defendant WinRutgers University
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
139 F. Supp. 3d 1224, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135873, 2015 WL 5834156
Judge(s)
Hernández
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellate court affirmed the Board of Review's denial of unemployment benefits, finding the claimant was not available for work or actively seeking work during the summer recess because she limited her job search by informing prospective employers she would return to her college nursing job in September.

What This Ruling Means

**Davis v. Con-Way Freight Inc. - Employment Dispute** This case involved an employment dispute between a worker named Davis and Con-Way Freight Inc., a trucking and logistics company. While the specific details of Davis's complaint are not provided in the available information, the case was filed as an employment law matter in 2015, suggesting it likely involved workplace issues such as wrongful termination, discrimination, wage disputes, or violation of employment rights. The court dismissed Davis's case, meaning the judge ruled against the employee and in favor of Con-Way Freight Inc. No damages were awarded to Davis, and the case was closed without the worker receiving any compensation or other remedies. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that employment lawsuits can be challenging to win and that courts will dismiss cases that don't meet legal standards or lack sufficient evidence. Workers considering legal action should ensure they have strong documentation of any workplace violations and seek proper legal counsel. While this particular case was unsuccessful, it doesn't prevent other workers from pursuing valid employment claims when they have experienced genuine workplace violations or discrimination.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.