Skip to main content

Davis Wire Corp. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 117

W.D. Wash.May 8, 2015No. Case No. C14-47 MJPCited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pechman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the union defendant's motion for summary judgment, finding that the union owed no implied duty of good faith and fair dealing to the employer regarding its funding of employee litigation, and that any such duty was trumped by the union's fiduciary obligations to its members.

What This Ruling Means

# Davis Wire Corp. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 117 — Case Summary ## What Happened Davis Wire Corp. had a dispute with Teamsters Local Union No. 117 involving employment law matters. The exact details of the disagreement are not fully documented in available court records, but it centered on issues between the company and the union representing its workers. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case in May 2015. No monetary damages were awarded to either party. The dismissal effectively ended the legal proceedings without resolving the underlying dispute on its merits. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case illustrates that employment disputes between companies and unions can reach the courts, though outcomes vary widely. When cases are dismissed rather than decided on the facts, workers may not get clarity on their rights or protections. Workers involved in union matters should keep detailed records of workplace issues and consult with their union representatives or employment advocates when disputes arise, since court outcomes are never guaranteed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.