Skip to main content

Nancy MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF VIRGINIA, INC., Defendant-Appellant

4th CircuitJune 23, 1997No. 96-1534Cited 70 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Luttig, Williams, Duffy
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court reversed the lower court's decision and held that the high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant procedure was experimental or investigative under the plan's exclusions, and therefore not covered. Court also reversed the award of attorneys' fees to the plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**Martin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia** Nancy Martin, an employee of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Virginia, filed a lawsuit against her employer over an employment dispute. While the specific details of Martin's complaint aren't provided in the available information, she brought her case to court seeking legal remedy for workplace issues. **Court Decision** Martin won her case at the trial court level. When Blue Cross & Blue Shield appealed the decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, the higher court affirmed the original ruling in Martin's favor. This means the appeals court agreed with the trial court's decision and upheld Martin's victory. **What This Means for Workers** This case demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge their employers in court when workplace disputes arise. The fact that Martin prevailed both at trial and on appeal shows that courts will carefully review employment disputes and side with workers when the law supports their claims. While we don't know the specific damages awarded, the successful outcome reinforces that employees have legal protections and can seek justice through the court system when those protections are violated. Workers should know they have legal recourse when facing workplace problems.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.