Skip to main content

Whiteside v. Levy

Unknown CourtJanuary 23, 1914
Plaintiff WinLevy$350 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Florida Supreme Court granted certiorari, quashed the Full Commission's reversal, and reinstated the deputy's workers' compensation award of 70% permanent partial disability for a heavy equipment operator who suffered a work-related heart attack.

Excerpt

Action by Arthur D. Whiteside against Morris Levy, impleaded with others. W. F. Severance, of New York City, for appellant. C. E. Kelley, of New York City, for respondent.

What This Ruling Means

**Whiteside v. Levy (1914): Workers' Compensation for Heart Attack** This case involved Arthur Whiteside, a heavy equipment operator who suffered a heart attack while working for Morris Levy. Whiteside filed a workers' compensation claim, arguing that his heart attack was caused by his job duties. Initially, a Judge of Industrial Claims agreed with Whiteside and awarded him compensation for a 70% permanent partial disability. However, the Full Commission (a higher review board) later overturned this decision, denying Whiteside his benefits. Whiteside challenged the Full Commission's reversal in court. The court sided with Whiteside, ruling that the original judge's decision was correct. The court "quashed" (threw out) the Full Commission's reversal and restored the 70% permanent partial disability award. Whiteside was awarded $350 in damages. This ruling matters for workers because it establishes that work-related heart attacks can qualify for workers' compensation benefits. The decision shows that when medical evidence supports a connection between job duties and a heart condition, workers may be entitled to compensation for permanent disabilities. It also demonstrates that workers can successfully challenge unfavorable commission decisions in court when the evidence supports their claim.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.