Skip to main content

Charles R. Kerns v. Consolidation Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

4th CircuitApril 2, 2001No. 95-2052Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinConsolidation Coal Company$16,678.04 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Kerns prevailed on appeal and was awarded attorney's fees of $12,258.04 plus additional compensation of $4,420.74 for delay in payment under the Black Lung Benefits Act.

What This Ruling Means

# Case Summary: Kerns v. Consolidation Coal Company **What Happened** Charles Kerns, a coal miner, filed a dispute with the Department of Labor seeking benefits he believed he was owed under the Black Lung Benefits Act, a federal program that compensates miners for serious lung diseases caused by coal dust. Consolidation Coal Company disputed his claim, leading to a legal fight over whether Kerns qualified for these protections. **What the Court Decided** A federal appeals court ruled in Kerns' favor. The court determined that he was entitled to receive his benefits. Beyond the main benefit amount, the court also ordered the company to pay $12,258.04 in attorney's fees (to cover his lawyer's costs) and an additional $4,420.74 in compensation for the delay in receiving his rightful payments. His total award came to $16,678.04. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that workers who believe they're wrongfully denied benefits can appeal unfavorable decisions and win. It also demonstrates that courts will hold employers financially accountable—not just for the benefits owed, but also for legal costs and penalties for delayed payments—which encourages companies to handle claims fairly from the start.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.