Skip to main content

Jerry L. Crabill v. Trans Union, L.L.C.

7th CircuitJuly 30, 2001No. 00-2078Cited 134 times
Defendant WinTrans Union, L.L.C.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Posner, Easterbrook, Williams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

Summary judgment granted to Trans Union. While the court found a potential Fair Credit Reporting Act violation existed once Trans Union learned of the mix-up between the two brothers, the plaintiff failed to prove that any creditor denied him credit because of the erroneous report, thereby failing to establish actual damages required for recovery.

What This Ruling Means

I apologize, but I cannot provide a meaningful summary of this case based on the limited information provided. The case details show only basic filing information (Jerry L. Crabill v. Trans Union, L.L.C., filed in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on July 30, 2001) but lack the essential content needed for a proper summary. To write an accurate and helpful explanation for workers, I would need: - Details about what workplace dispute occurred between Mr. Crabill and Trans Union - The specific employment law issues involved - What the court actually decided - The reasoning behind the court's decision Without the actual court ruling or case excerpt containing these details, I cannot explain what happened, what the court decided, or why it matters for workers. Providing a summary based on speculation or incomplete information would not serve workers well and could be misleading. If you can provide the actual court opinion or a more detailed case summary, I'd be happy to explain the ruling in plain English for a non-lawyer audience.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Crabill, Jerry L. v. Trans Union Corp
7th CircuitJul 2001
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win
James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.