Skip to main content

Daniel C. Murray v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 400 Donald Cash Christian Sauter

4th CircuitMay 10, 2002No. 01-1602Cited 101 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Williams, Traxler, Howard, Eastern
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Fourth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of the motion to dismiss and compel arbitration of Murray's race discrimination claim, finding the arbitration agreement unconscionable and structurally biased in favor of Local 400, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**Murray v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union: What Workers Need to Know** This case involved Daniel Murray, who had a dispute with his labor union, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Local 400. The specific details of Murray's complaint against the union are not clear from the available information, but it appears to have been an employment-related disagreement between a worker and his union representatives. Unfortunately, the court's final decision in this case is not available in the records. The case was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in May 2002, but the outcome and reasoning behind any ruling are unknown. No monetary damages were reported in connection with this case. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case highlights an important reality for union members: workers can have legal disputes with their own unions, not just with employers. Union members have certain rights regarding how their union represents them, and there are legal channels available if they believe their union has failed to meet its obligations. If you're having issues with your union representation, it's worth understanding that legal options may exist, though each situation is unique and requires careful consideration.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.