Skip to main content

Johnnie Mae Rowe v. Union Planters Bank of Southeast Missouri, Kevin Chambers, Patricia Robbins

8th CircuitJune 25, 2002No. 01-3080Cited 35 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McMillian, Heaney, Riley
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the bank and its employees, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie elements of discrimination under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act, including that she was qualified for the loan and that similarly situated applicants of different races received favorable treatment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Johnnie Mae Rowe sued Union Planters Bank of Southeast Missouri and two of its employees, claiming they discriminated against her when she applied for a loan. Rowe alleged the bank denied her loan application because of her race, violating federal laws that protect people from discrimination in lending and housing. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court ruled in favor of the bank and its employees. The court found that Rowe failed to prove the basic elements needed to show discrimination occurred. Specifically, she couldn't demonstrate that she was qualified for the loan or that other loan applicants of different races with similar financial situations received better treatment from the bank. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows how difficult it can be to prove discrimination in financial services. To win a discrimination lawsuit, workers and consumers must provide strong evidence that they were treated unfairly compared to others in similar situations. Simply being denied a loan or service isn't enough - you need concrete proof that the denial was based on your protected characteristics like race, and that others were treated better under similar circumstances.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.