Skip to main content

Granada Insurance Co. v. Mark A. Cereceda, D.C., P.A.

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.December 31, 2008No. No. 3D07-2000Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Cortiñas, Green, Shepherd
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court issued a one-word denial order without explanation of the underlying claims or relief sought.

What This Ruling Means

# Granada Insurance Co. v. Mark A. Cereceda, D.C., P.A. ## What Happened Granada Insurance Company filed a case against Mark A. Cereceda, D.C., P.A. (a dental practice) in Florida in 2008. The dispute involved employment law issues, though the specific details of the disagreement are not fully documented in the available court records. ## What the Court Decided The appellate court could not reach a final resolution in this case. The outcome was marked as "unresolvable," meaning the court did not issue a clear decision on the merits of the dispute. No damages were awarded to either party. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case highlights that employment disputes don't always result in clear outcomes. Even when cases reach higher courts, they may not be fully resolved due to procedural issues, missing information, or other complications. Workers involved in similar situations should understand that the legal process can be unpredictable and may require persistence through multiple court proceedings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.