Skip to main content

Teamsters Local Union 682 v. Kci Construction Company, Inc.

8th CircuitOctober 20, 2004No. 03-3154Cited 3 times
RemandedKCI Construction Company, Inc.$112,721.15 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wollman, McMillian, Riley
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's summary judgment confirming arbitration awards and remanded for further proceedings, holding that the court must determine whether the arbitration awards enforce an unlawful hot cargo agreement under 29 U.S.C. § 158(e) before confirming them.

What This Ruling Means

# Teamsters Local Union 682 v. KCI Construction Company **What Happened** The Teamsters union and KCI Construction Company had a dispute that went to arbitration—a private process where a neutral person decides disagreements instead of going to court. The arbitration resulted in awards totaling over $112,000 in damages favoring the union. KCI asked a district court to confirm these awards, and the court initially agreed. However, the union challenged this decision. **What the Court Decided** The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's decision and sent the case back. The appeals court ruled that before confirming the arbitration awards, the court must first examine whether those awards were based on an illegal "hot cargo agreement"—an arrangement where employers agree not to handle goods from certain companies. Federal law prohibits such agreements. **Why This Matters** This ruling protects workers by ensuring that arbitration decisions cannot enforce unlawful agreements between unions and employers. The court must verify that settlements follow labor laws, preventing workers from being harmed by legally prohibited deals made behind closed doors.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.