Skip to main content

William T. Killman v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Sahara Coal Trust

7th CircuitJuly 19, 2005No. 04-2506Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinSahara Coal Company
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Posner, Manton, Wood
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Killman's petition for review was granted. The Seventh Circuit vacated and remanded the Benefits Review Board's decision, finding that the ALJ failed to properly determine the exertional requirements of Killman's foreman job and ensure physicians based their opinions on correct job requirements before denying black lung benefits.

What This Ruling Means

# Killman v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs **What Happened** William Killman, a coal miner, applied for black lung disease benefits after developing respiratory problems. Sahara Coal Company and government officials denied his claim. Killman argued that the decision was wrong because the judge didn't properly understand what his job as a foreman actually involved. **What the Court Decided** A federal appeals court agreed with Killman. The court found that the administrative judge made a critical error: he didn't correctly identify the physical demands of Killman's foreman position before asking doctors to decide if his lung disease prevented him from doing that job. Without accurate job requirements, the doctors couldn't properly evaluate whether Killman was disabled. The court overturned the denial and sent the case back for a new review using the correct job requirements. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers seeking occupational disease benefits. It ensures that employers and judges must accurately understand what workers actually did on the job before deciding they aren't sick enough for benefits. Getting the job details right is essential to fairly evaluating whether someone can still work.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.