Skip to main content

International Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employees v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitJuly 8, 2003No. Nos. 01-1456, 01-1504, 01-1509 & 02-1035Cited 19 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Henderson, Sentelle, Tatel
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationUnfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination

Outcome

The court reversed the NLRB's decision, holding that employers lawfully refused to accept union referrals after the union engaged in an illegal strike. The court determined that hiring hall registrants who participated in the illegal strike lost NLRA protection.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Workers Lose Protection After Illegal Strike** This case involved a dispute between the International Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employees union and several convention service companies, including GES and Freeman. The union had a hiring hall arrangement where it referred workers to these employers for convention setup jobs. When the union organized a strike that the court later determined was illegal, the employers refused to accept any more worker referrals from the union. The union filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), claiming the employers were retaliating against union members and engaging in unfair labor practices. The NLRB initially sided with the union, but the employers appealed to federal court. The court reversed the NLRB's decision, ruling that the employers acted legally when they refused union referrals. The court found that because the strike was illegal, workers who participated lost their protection under federal labor law. **What this means for workers:** When unions engage in strikes that violate labor law, participating workers can lose important legal protections. Employers may then legally refuse to hire those workers without it being considered retaliation. Workers should understand that not all strikes receive the same legal protection.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.