Skip to main content
Claim Type

Unfair Labor Practice Cases

45 employment law court rulings from public federal records (19732025)

45
Total Rulings
29%
Plaintiff Win Rate
D.C. Circuit
Top Court

About Unfair Labor Practice Claims

Unfair labor practice claims involve violations of the National Labor Relations Act, which protects employees' rights to organize, join unions, and engage in collective bargaining. These claims may address employer interference with union activities, discrimination against union members, or refusal to bargain in good faith with a certified union representative.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
20 (44%)
Plaintiff Win
13 (29%)
Mixed Result
8 (18%)
Remanded
3 (7%)
Dismissed
1 (2%)

Related Laws

Court Rulings (45)

United Faculty of Florida v. Florida State University Board of Trustees and Florida Public Employees Relations Commission.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.Dec 23, 2025
Defendant Win
State ex rel. Intl. Union of Operating Engineers, Local 20 v. State Employment Relations Bd.
Unknown CourtApr 18, 2023

The trial court did not err in denying the Union's petition for a writ of mandamus when it determined SERB did not abuse its discretion in finding no probable cause to support the Union's claim of an unfair labor practice.

Defendant Win
INTEGRITY KOKOSING PIPELINE SERVICES, L.L.C. v. PIPELINERS UNION 798 UNITED ASSOCIATION
S.D. Ind.Sep 15, 2021Indiana
Mixed Result
Kingsbery
E.D. La.Aug 18, 2021California
Remanded
Clackamas County Employees' Assn. v. Clackamas County
Or. Ct. App.Dec 23, 2020
Remanded
Pilchman
2nd CircuitDec 18, 2020
Defendant Win
FLRA
D.C. CircuitJun 12, 2020
Defendant Win
NLRB v. Jam Productions, Limited
7th CircuitJun 28, 2018Illinois
Remanded
Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 503 v. Univ. of Or.
Or. Ct. App.Apr 4, 2018
Plaintiff Win
Wood
D.D.C.Jun 15, 2017District of Columbia
Mixed Result
State ex rel. Murray v. Ohio State Emp. Relations Bd.
Ohio Ct. App.Mar 9, 2017

Mandamus denied SERB did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed unfair labor practice charges as untimely.

Defendant Win
Kreisberg ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Emerald Green Building Services, LLC
D. Mass.Nov 13, 2015Massachusetts
Mixed Result
UC Health v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitSep 18, 2015
Mixed Result
McKinney Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Creative Vision Resources, L.L.C.
5th CircuitApr 13, 2015Louisiana
Defendant Win
FLRA
D.C. CircuitApr 7, 2015
Dismissed
Washington Federation Of State Employees, App. v. University Of Wa., P.e.r.c., Res.
Wash. Ct. App.Jun 24, 2013
Plaintiff Win
Trump Plaza Associates v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitMay 11, 2012New Jersey
Defendant Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Grapetree Shores, Inc.
3rd CircuitNov 16, 2011
Plaintiff Win
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 513 v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitApr 5, 2011
Plaintiff Win
Wood Dale Fire Protection District v. Illinois Labor Relations Board
Ill. App. Ct.Oct 2, 2009
Defendant Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Grenada Stamping & Assembly Inc.
5th CircuitApr 23, 2009
Plaintiff Win
NORELLI
E.D. Cal.Apr 7, 2009California
Plaintiff Win
St. John's Mercy Health System v. Division of Employment Security
Mo.Jan 13, 2009
Plaintiff Win
Chicago Transit Authority v. Illinois Labor Relations Board
Ill. App. Ct.Nov 6, 2008
Defendant Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Studio Transportation Drivers Local 399
9th CircuitMay 12, 2008
Plaintiff Win
United Steel Workers of America Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, Tower Industries, Inc., Intervenor
9th CircuitApr 2, 2007
Defendant Win
Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Pa. Commw. Ct.Dec 7, 2006
Defendant Win
Service Employees International Union Local 503 v. State
Or. Ct. App.Dec 6, 2006
Defendant Win
Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitSep 11, 2006
Plaintiff Win
American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2510 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
D.C. CircuitJun 27, 2006
Defendant Win
Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers & Grain Millers International Union, Local 37 v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitJun 23, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the Pacific
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 22, 2005
Defendant Win
Dunkin' Donuts Mid-Atlantic Distribution Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitApr 2, 2004
Defendant Win
Intl Un Oprt Eng470 v. NLRB
D.C. CircuitDec 2, 2003
Defendant Win
International Alliance of Theatrical & Stage Employees v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitJul 8, 2003
Defendant Win
Stanford Hospital & Clinics v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitApr 18, 2003
Mixed Result
Steven Lucas v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitApr 16, 2003
Plaintiff Win
Tinker Air Force Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
10th CircuitNov 4, 2002
Defendant Win
Allied Industries Employees, Teamsters, Local 481, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitSep 17, 2002
Mixed Result
Vlasic Farms Inc. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
PAJul 25, 2001
Defendant Win
ITT Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitJun 5, 2001
Mixed Result
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1036 v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitMay 17, 2001
Plaintiff Win
Moore-Duncan Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Aldworth Co.
D.N.J.Dec 20, 2000New Jersey
Plaintiff Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 23, 1974
Defendant Win
Nlrb v. Riviera Manor Nursing Home, Inc
7th CircuitNov 16, 1973
Mixed Result

Showing 145 of 45 rulings · Page 1 of 1

Think you may have a unfair labor practice claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.