State Employment Relations Board
3 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2004–2023)
4 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 3 map to 3 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list State Employment Relations Board as an employer in 3 distinct federal employment cases between 2004 and 2023.
The most common claims on record were Wrongful Termination, Breach Of Contract, and Unfair Labor Practice.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 3 distinct cases.
About this employer
State Employment Relations Board appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
State ex rel. Intl. Union of Operating Engineers, Local 20 v. State Employment Relations Bd. (2023) — Defendant Win. Read the ruling.
State Ex Rel. Kingsley v. State Employment Relations Board (2011) — Defendant Win. Kingsley, a state employee, challenged a law that changed how her job position was classified. She believed this reclassification violated the constitution and tried to use a special legal procedure called "mandamus" to force the State Employment Relations Board to take action. Read the ruling.
State ex rel. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board (2004) — Plaintiff Win. The Ohio Civil Service Employees Association (OCSEA) challenged the State Employment Relations Board (SERB) after the state passed a law that changed how public employees could organize and bargain collectively. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wrongful Termination, Breach of Contract, Unfair Labor Practice. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wrongful Termination, Breach of Contract and Unfair Labor Practice.
These published opinions sit within the public sector, where due-process protections, First Amendment retaliation, and union-related (NLRA / state PERB) claims apply.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Government & Public Sector employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.