No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The PBGC prevailed on summary judgment. The court affirmed that the PBGC properly set the plan termination date as June 14, 2002, correctly interpreted ERISA to cover only nonforfeitable benefits as of the termination date, and appropriately declined to administer the individual account portions of the pension plan. Deppenbrook was not entitled to shutdown benefits because he was not terminated until after the plan termination date.
Deppenbrook v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (2015)
What Happened
Deppenbrook worked for Republic Technologies International and participated in the company's pension plan. When the company's pension plan ended, Deppenbrook claimed he was entitled to additional shutdown benefits because he argued he should have received them before the official termination date.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), the federal agency that protects pension plans. The court ruled that the pension plan properly terminated on June 14, 2002, and only benefits that were guaranteed by that date qualified for protection. Since Deppenbrook wasn't formally terminated until after the plan ended, he was not eligible for the shutdown benefits he requested.
Why This Matters
This case clarifies that when pension plans terminate, workers can only claim benefits that were locked in before the official termination date. Timing matters significantly—if you're terminated after a plan ends, you may not receive additional shutdown benefits. Workers facing pension plan terminations should understand exactly when their plan ends and what benefits they're entitled to receive.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.